You would have a higher chance at getting hired at Delta or Hawaiian since they fly that aircraft but still not very likely from the start as those airlines are 4 and 5 star rated. For example if you only have a A330 license you may possibly get hired at Southwest but not very likely and even if you did you wouldn't be able to generate a schedule since you aren't rated in any of the planes they fly (737). There are licenses you have to buy with your virtual income to get airlines interested in hiring you and to be able to get schedules from them. I looked a little at APLv2 but could not see from their site if this is a built-in requirement.ĪPL doesnt require any test. Noel, does APLv2 require you to complete tests to fly a particular aircraft? If so, is it mandatory? I have looked at a few programs like this over the years but I can not bring myself to need to go through a silly virtual test, I just want to fly the aircraft I know how to fly. Right now they are working on new voicesets so I guess if you care about that. PACX initially seemed like it would bridge that gap but fell short. We dont have an ideal replacement for FSPassengers. This is what the product is and its reached the end of development (which is a complete trainwreck btw) and if he would just come out and say that people would stop dragging him under the bus. He isnt working on it anymore and the product doesnt do anything it says it does (Emergencies, dynamic integrations with crew, disruptive passengers or other onboard issues) All he is doing is trying to keep the website up and make passive income.

If you email him he will keep saying the same thing (right around the corner, 99% done) Discord on read only, youtube comments blocked. He has been saying V1.6 is almost done for almost 3 years now. Can we as a community STOP promoting Self Loading Cargo? The guy is a fraud and is disrespecting the hobby to the fullest. Self Loading Cargo is another option, similar to PACX.

Passenger simulation fsx